CompanyEnrich Review

CompanyEnrich sells B2B data as an API: company and people enrichment, semantic search, lookalike discovery, and reverse email lookup, built for developers and sales teams to consume programmatically rather than through a search UI. This review covers what's verifiable from the vendor's own site — pricing, credit mechanics, feature scope — and is upfront that there's no independent review base to draw on yet.

Verdict at a glance

What is CompanyEnrich?

CompanyEnrich positions itself as data infrastructure rather than a sales tool with a UI bolted on top. The core claim is real-time access to 30 million-plus verified companies and 170 million-plus people profiles, exposed through endpoints for company enrichment, people search, semantic search, lookalike discovery, and reverse email lookup. The semantic search angle is a differentiator vendors in this category usually skip: instead of filtering by exact fields (industry = X, headcount = Y), you query in plain language and get companies that match the intent.

The target audience is broader than a typical sales tool. The vendor's own site names sales teams doing prospecting, technical teams wiring data into CRMs or automations, and AI agents that need structured, real-time company data mid-workflow — which is also why an MCP server for agent integrations ships alongside the REST API.

How it works

Access is API-first: sign up, get a key, and call endpoints directly or through documented SDKs, with an MCP server available for agent-based workflows. Each call consumes credits at a rate set per endpoint, not a flat charge — company enrichment costs 1 credit, people search runs 2 credits per profile, finding a work email costs 10 credits, and finding a mobile number costs 30 credits. Autocomplete, the preview endpoint, and a company-logo lookup are free. Rate limits scale by plan, from 60 requests/minute on Starter to 600/minute on Scale — relevant if you're calling this from a live agent rather than batch-processing lists. A 500-credit free trial lets you test enrichment and search behavior before committing to a plan.

CompanyEnrich pricing (2026)

The per-credit price drops sharply as you move up plans, which matters because the endpoints aren't priced equally:

• Company enrichment (1 credit) costs roughly $0.0098 per call on Starter, falling to $0.0011 on Scale — cheap at any tier.
• Find Email (10 credits) works out to about $0.098 per email on Starter, roughly $0.011 on Scale — a 9x spread for the identical call.
• Find Mobile (30 credits) is the expensive endpoint: about $0.294 per lookup on Starter, versus roughly $0.033 on Scale.

The practical read: 5,000 Starter credits cover only about 500 email lookups or 166 mobile lookups if that's the bulk of your usage, versus 5,000 plain enrichments. Teams doing heavy contact-finding should size against their actual endpoint mix, not the headline credit count. Pro and Scale add credit rollover; only Scale adds the Preview API, async endpoints, and Batch API. Annual plans exist at a discount, but the vendor doesn't publish the percentage — get that number before committing to a year.

What we could and couldn't verify

We verified pricing, credit mechanics, and feature scope directly from the vendor's site (stated as vendor claims, not independently tested). What we could not find: any independent review presence. CompanyEnrich has no accessible G2 or Trustpilot listing at time of writing, and Reddit or forum searches turned up nothing substantive. The site's own testimonials — from Cold Labs, Netspore, Vertical, and Glassboard, among named customers including Clay, ContactOut, and Salesforge — are vendor-selected and read positively, but they're not a substitute for independent sentiment, and we're not treating them as one. Budget time for your own trial against the free 500 credits rather than relying on outside validation, because there isn't much yet.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Large stated data footprint (30M+ companies, 170M+ people) with multiple enrichment angles in one API
• Semantic search and lookalike discovery go beyond standard field-filter enrichment tools
• Transparent per-endpoint credit pricing — you can see exactly what each call type costs
• MCP server support for AI agents is ahead of most enrichment vendors in this category
• Free 500-credit trial before any payment

Cons

• No independent review base yet (G2, Trustpilot, Reddit) to weigh vendor claims against
• Contact-finding endpoints (email, and especially mobile) cost meaningfully more per unit than plain enrichment, which can make the headline credit count misleading
• Annual discount percentage isn't published — requires a sales conversation for real numbers
• Batch API and async endpoints are Scale-only ($549/month), gating bulk workflows behind the top tier

CompanyEnrich alternatives

B2B enrichment and contact-data APIs are a crowded category with overlapping but distinct strengths:

• Apollo — pairs a large contact database with built-in outreach sequencing, so you get enrichment and sending in one platform rather than a pure API.
• Clay — a workflow-builder layer that pulls from many enrichment providers (including ones like CompanyEnrich) rather than owning its own dataset outright.
• ZoomInfo — the incumbent enterprise data provider, with a far larger sales motion and price tag.
• Lusha — contact and company data with a lighter-weight, prospecting-focused UI alongside its API.
• Wiza — focused specifically on LinkedIn-to-email contact extraction rather than broad company enrichment.
• Generect — a lead-generation and enrichment tool with a similar API-plus-credits pricing model.

If your priority is a pure API with transparent per-call pricing and agent-friendly tooling, CompanyEnrich's package is competitive. If you need outreach sequencing bundled in, or a much larger enterprise footprint with account support, the alternatives above are worth pricing out first.

Who should use CompanyEnrich — and who shouldn't

Good fit: technical teams building enrichment into a CRM, automation, or AI agent where API access and predictable per-call pricing matter more than a polished UI; sales teams comfortable working through an API or a tool like Clay on top of one; teams whose main need is company-level enrichment and semantic search rather than high-volume phone finding.

Poor fit: teams wanting an all-in-one platform with outreach sequencing built in (look at Apollo instead); teams running high volumes of mobile-number lookups, where per-unit cost adds up fastest; anyone who needs independent, third-party validation before adopting a data vendor — that evidence doesn't yet exist publicly for CompanyEnrich.