Follow Review

Follow is a Chrome extension that works a narrow, specific vein of LinkedIn prospecting: the people who already engaged with a post. Point it at any public LinkedIn post and it pulls the likers and commenters into a lead list with contact data attached, ready to export or push into a CRM. This review covers what's verifiable from the vendor site, what the pricing actually costs per lead, and where independent evidence is thin.

Verdict at a glance

What kind of tool is Follow?

Follow is a lead-extraction extension, not a full sequencer or CRM. It sits between LinkedIn and whatever you already use to reach out: you feed it a post URL, it scrapes the list of people who liked or commented, and it attaches roughly 20 data points per person — name, job title, email, company name, and company size among them — before handing the list back as a CSV or pushing it into a connected tool.

The pitch is about intent, not volume. Instead of building a list from a Sales Navigator search (people who match a job title but have never heard of you), Follow builds a list from people who already clicked like or left a comment on relevant content — yours, a competitor's, or an industry account's. The vendor's marketing claims a "+40% reply rate" from this approach, a figure that appears only on Follow's own site with no methodology attached, so treat it as an advertised claim rather than a verified result.

How it works

Setup is genuinely light: install the Chrome extension, authenticate against your LinkedIn session, open a post, and click extract. There's no bulk multi-post automation visible on the site — it's a per-post workflow, which matters if your plan is to mine dozens of posts a week versus checking a handful tied to your own content calendar. Extracted leads export as CSV or route directly into Salesforce, HubSpot, Salesloft, Outreach, or Lemlist; API and webhook access is included on every tier, including Free, for teams that want to pipe leads somewhere else entirely.

Follow pricing (2026)

A few details that change the real math:

• A credit is spent per extraction attempt, not per success. Follow's own pricing page confirms an email search uses a credit even when no email is found, so a list heavy on personal Gmail addresses or private profiles can burn through credits without returning usable data.
• Extra credits cost the same rate as the Start plan: €49 per additional 1,000-credit pack, so there's no volume discount for scaling past your plan's allotment.
• Every plan is single-user. Pricing pages show no team-seat tier, so a 3-person SDR team on Scale means either sharing one login or paying €99 three times.
• Credits roll over month to month, which softens the sting of a slow month but doesn't change the per-lead price.

Note the currency: pricing is listed in euros (€) on the live site, not dollars — worth flagging since some third-party listings of this tool show dollar figures that don't match what's actually charged.

What we could and couldn't verify

We could verify pricing, credit mechanics, and the integration list directly from Follow's site. We could not find a G2 or Trustpilot profile for Follow or getfollow.io, and no meaningful Reddit discussion of the product turned up either — this reads as a small, early-stage tool without a public review trail yet. The one third-party data point available is the Chrome Web Store listing, at 3.7 out of 5 from just 3 ratings and roughly 820 installs — too small a sample to draw any real conclusion from, disclosed here only because it's the sole independent signal that exists. Treat the vendor's reply-rate and conversion claims as unverified marketing copy until tested against your own list.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Targets people who've already shown interest via engagement, not a cold list
• 20+ data points per lead, including a stab at an email address
• Direct push into Salesforce, HubSpot, Salesloft, Outreach, and Lemlist
• API and webhook access on every plan, even Free
• Unused credits roll over instead of expiring

Cons

• Credits are consumed on failed email lookups, not just successful ones
• No visible independent review base — no G2/Trustpilot presence, minimal Chrome Web Store data
• Per-post, extension-driven workflow — no bulk automation across many posts at once
• Single-user plans only, so team pricing multiplies quickly
• Priced in euros with no listed USD option

Follow alternatives

Follow's niche — pulling leads from post engagement rather than a Sales Navigator search — is narrower than most of the field, so the closest comparisons mix direct competitors and adjacent LinkedIn prospecting tools:

• Wiza — Sales Navigator list export with email verification; built for volume search rather than post engagement.
• Evaboot — similar Sales Navigator export focus, positioned on clean, verified data.
• LeadIQ — prospecting plus direct CRM sync, aimed at larger sales teams.
• Closely — LinkedIn outreach automation with its own list-building and email-finder features.
• Waalaxy — LinkedIn and email sequencing combined with connection-based prospecting.

Most of these compete on Sales Navigator export volume; Follow's differentiator is narrower and more intent-based — it only makes sense if you have posts worth mining in the first place.

Who should use Follow — and who shouldn't

Good fit: reps or founders who post on LinkedIn regularly and want to convert their own engagement into a call list; marketers or agencies tracking a competitor's or industry account's post activity for warm leads; teams that already use Salesforce, HubSpot, Salesloft, Outreach, or Lemlist and want a lightweight feed into them.

Poor fit: teams needing bulk, list-based prospecting across many job titles or companies (a Sales Navigator export tool fits better); anyone who needs verified independent reviews before buying, since none of real substance exist yet; multi-seat teams, since every plan is single-user and costs multiply per person.