Scrupp Review

Scrupp sells one narrow job, priced by the credit: turning a LinkedIn Sales Navigator search into a clean, enriched spreadsheet. This review covers what the vendor advertises, what the credit math costs per usable contact, and what we could not independently verify.

Verdict at a glance

What kind of tool Scrupp is

Scrupp is a Chrome extension and web app in the LinkedIn export category — the same shelf as Evaboot, Wiza, and Findymail. You paste a Sales Navigator search URL, it walks the results in your own browser session, and hands back a file with person fields (name, title, seniority, profile URL), company fields (size, industry, location), and contact fields (work email, phone, provider type). The vendor advertises 15+ fields and exports of up to 2,500 leads per Sales Navigator search, which reflects LinkedIn's own result ceiling. Plans also cover basic LinkedIn profile export, Apollo export from the Growth tier up, and enrichment of a CSV you already own.

How it works

The extension runs in your logged-in session rather than through a headless scraper or a credentials handoff, and Scrupp states plainly that it asks for no password and runs at normal browsing speed. That matters because the common failure mode in this category is a LinkedIn restriction on your account; browsing-speed extraction sits at the lower-risk end, though no third-party LinkedIn tool is risk-free.

After extraction, Scrupp verifies emails over SMTP, deduplicates against your previous exports, and pushes results to CSV, XLSX, Google Sheets, or directly into HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Clay, Airtable, Notion, Slack, or Zapier. Pro and Enterprise add a REST API.

Scrupp pricing (2026)

The sticker price is not the number that matters. Credits burn per action: 1 to scrape a contact, +1 for a verified email, +2 for a phone; re-verification is free. So a contact with an email costs 2 credits, and one with email and phone costs 4. Run that through the plans:

• Starter ($29 / 1,000 credits): 500 emailed contacts, about 5.8 cents each — or 250 contacts with phones at about 11.6 cents each.
• Growth ($39 / 2,000): 1,000 emailed contacts, about 3.9 cents each.
• Pro ($59 / 5,000): 2,500 emailed contacts, about 2.4 cents each.
• Enterprise ($99 / 10,000): 5,000 emailed contacts, about 2 cents each.

One more adjustment: Scrupp advertises roughly a 65% email find rate. If a third of your list comes back without an address, the cost per usable prospect on Starter is closer to 9 cents than 5.8 — still competitive, but budget against found contacts, not scraped ones.

Two genuinely good terms: monthly credits roll over on paid plans, and one-time packs (from $35 for 1,000 down to $599 for 100,000) never expire. For project-based prospecting, the packs often beat carrying a subscription.

What we could and couldn't verify

Everything above — plans, prices, credit costs, integrations, the 65% find rate — comes from Scrupp's current site and is a vendor claim, not a measured result. We did not test the tool.

On independent sentiment we came up empty, and that is worth stating plainly: no reachable G2 or Trustpilot profile for Scrupp, and no substantive Reddit discussion. Its Chrome Web Store listing shows a 5-star average, but a store rating on a vendor's own extension is a weak signal and we could not confirm how many ratings sit behind it. There is no independent evidence base for the accuracy claims, the advertised sub-5% bounce rate, or support quality.

The practical response is the free tier: 100 credits is enough to export a real search in your niche and check match rate and email quality against contacts you can verify yourself. Do that before committing to an annual plan.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Free tier with no credit card, enough to evaluate match rates honestly
• Transparent per-action credit pricing rather than opaque "lead" units
• Credits roll over; one-time packs never expire
• Runs in your own browser session, no LinkedIn password handoff
• Broad export and CRM push options, plus an API on Pro
• Roughly 2 cents per emailed contact at the top plan

Cons

• No independent review base to corroborate accuracy or support claims
• Phone lookups cost 2x an email, escalating the real price quickly
• The ~65% find rate means a third of a list needs another source
• Apollo export and CSV enrichment are gated above the entry plan
• All LinkedIn extraction carries account risk LinkedIn does not sanction

Scrupp alternatives

• Evaboot — the closest competitor for Sales Navigator export with filtering and email finding; larger public review base.
• Wiza — similar export-plus-enrichment workflow, longer track record, solid CRM integrations.
• Findymail — email-finding first, with a bounce guarantee and a Sales Navigator export layer.
• Apollo.io — a full database and sequencer rather than an export tool; better if you want prospecting and outreach in one system.
• Clay — waterfall enrichment across many providers; higher ceiling, higher complexity, and a better fit once one provider's find rate stops being enough.
• PhantomBuster — general-purpose LinkedIn automation, more flexible and more hands-on to configure.

Who should use Scrupp — and who shouldn't

Good fit: teams already paying for Sales Navigator who need searches turned into enriched, deduplicated files quickly; recruiters sourcing candidates; agencies that prefer one-time credit packs over another monthly subscription for bursty client work.

Poor fit: buyers who need a deep public track record before committing; teams needing high phone coverage, where the 2-credit charge wrecks the per-contact economics; anyone who wants a searchable prospect database rather than a LinkedIn extractor; and organizations whose policies rule out these tools entirely.